The Nigerian state of Niger, a signatory to Islamic Sharia law, has been embroiled in controversy over the ban on the sale and consumption of alcoholic drinks. Although the state government denied issuing such a directive, some local governments, particularly Suleja, insisted on implementing the ban, citing conflict with Islamic injunctions.
The Liquor Law, enacted during the administration of the late Abdullahi Kure, aimed to regulate the sales and consumption of liquor in the state without intending to propagate Sharia law, which forbids alcoholic drinks. The law led to controversies over the years, raising questions about its relevance, especially given the prevalence of sellers and consumers of liquor in the state.
The Liquor and Licensing Board of Niger State announced plans to ban alcohol sales in Suleja from January 1, 2024, leading to strong reactions. While Governor Mohammed Bago denied the ban, some local governments, including Suleja, insisted on enforcing it, claiming it aligns with Islamic principles.
Residents expressed concerns about the potential impact on businesses and questioned the continued relevance of the law. Some argued that the ban could disproportionately affect non-Muslims and undermine personal freedoms.
Despite the government’s denial, indications suggest that the ban might be implemented in some areas. Business owners, especially those in the alcohol industry, expressed fear of losing their livelihoods and called for a reconsideration of the decision.
The chairman of the Hotel Proprietors Association of Suleja acknowledged receiving information about impending restrictions on alcohol sales, especially in certain areas near the town’s boundaries. He expressed concerns about the economic implications and emphasized the need for a balanced approach.
The controversy highlights the complex nature of regulating alcohol in a diverse society with different religious beliefs. The conflict between the Liquor Law and public opinion underscores the challenges in finding a consensus that respects individual freedoms while addressing cultural and religious considerations.
